Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Zero tolerance doesn't work | Main | Emergency Management Solutions January 2013 »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Hi Lucien. I just posted on my blog, triecker.wordpress.com, about your article - which is think is a great reflection of what emergency planning has evolved to. We really need to get it back in the right perspective. Excellent post!
Posted by: Triecker.wordpress.com | 01/29/2013 at 10:53 AM
Thanks for the kind words and for passing the article on. I'm still thinking through a lot of the implications of what I' suggesting because I don't want to discourage or limit planners. But I do think we need to acknowledge that our resources are limited and that we need prioritize our planning. Continuous improvement is the goal.
Posted by: Lucien Canton | 01/29/2013 at 11:29 AM
Another complication with chasing compliance around is that it can change every 4 years. You mention focusing on EMFs. They were the guidance just before ESFs. And now there are Core Capabilities. It all boils down to the same thing. Write a good plan, include operations planners in the planning process, account for resource gaps, keep accurate behavior assumptions, and your resulting plan will be realistic and valuable.
Posted by: D | 01/30/2013 at 05:20 AM